Chapter 4: Healthcare structure

Notes, references, updates and links

References


Healthcare structures 1-2 

1. Marmot, Michael, Allen, Jessica, Goldblatt, Peter, et al. Fair Society, Healthy Lives: The Marmot Review.
UCL; 2010. 

2. Office for National Statistics. Healthcare Expenditure, UK Health Accounts: 2019.
ONS; 2021. 

The public health budget (via local authorities) is £3.3bn, hospitals cost £85bn and GP practices, dentists and others £42bn. 


Prevention or cure?

3. Coote, Anna, Penny, Joe. The Wrong Medicine: A Review of the Impacts of NHS Reforms in England.
New Economics Foundation; 2014.


Care closer to home 4-7 

4. Gray M, Airoldi M, Bevan G, McCulloch P. Deriving optimal value from each system.
J R Soc Med. 2017;110(7):283-286. doi:10.1177/0141076817711090

5. Jarman B, Gault S, Alves B, et al. Explaining differences in English hospital death rates using routinely collected data.
BMJ. 1999;318(7197):1515-1520. doi:10.1136/bmj.318.7197.1515

6. Starfield, B, Shi, L, Macinko, J. Contribution of primary care to health systems and health.
Milbank Q. 2005;83(3):457-502. doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2005.00409.x

7. Dowrick C. Why do the O’Sheas consult so often? An exploration of complex family illness behaviour.
Soc Sci Med. 1992;34(5):491-497. doi:10.1016/0277-9536(92)90204-4


NHS structures 8-11 

8. Regmi K, Mudyarabikwa O. A systematic review of the factors - barriers and enablers - affecting the implementation of clinical commissioning policy to reduce health inequalities in the National Health Service (NHS), UK.
Public Health. 2020;186:271-282. doi:10.1016/j.puhe.2020.07.027

9. Salway S, Mir G, Turner D, Ellison GTH, Carter L, Gerrish K. Obstacles to “race equality” in the English National Health Service: Insights from the healthcare commissioning arena.
Soc Sci Med. 2016;152:102-110. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2016.01.031

10. Smith R. Oh NHS, thou art sick.

BMJ. 2002;324(7330):127-128. doi:10.1136/bmj.324.7330.127

11. see note 3, Coote 2014


Integrated care systems 12 

12. Gerard K, Salisbury C, Street D, Pope C, Baxter H. Is fast access to general practice all that should matter? A discrete choice experiment of patients’ preferences.
J Health Serv Res Policy. 2008;13(suppl 2):3-10. doi:10.1258/jhsrp.2007.007087


Primary care networks 13 

13. Russell, Cormac. We don’t have a health problem, we have a village problem.
Community Medicine. Vol 1; 2020:1-12.


Patient involvement 14-15 

14. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L, et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research.
Health Expect. 2008;11(1):72-84. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2007.00476.x

15. Gallan AS. Factors that influence physicians’ prescribing of pharmaceuticals: a literature review.
J Pharm Mark Manage. 2004;16(4):3-46. doi:10.3109/J058v16n04_02


Measuring the cost-effectiveness of care 16-17 

16. Devlin N, Parkin D. Does NICE have a cost-effectiveness threshold and what other factors influence its decisions? A binary choice analysis.
Health Econ. 2004;13(5):437-452. doi:10.1002/hec.864

17. Chamberlain C, Collin SM, Stephens P, Donovan J, Bahl A, Hollingworth W. Does the cancer drugs fund lead to faster uptake of cost-effective drugs? A time-trend analysis comparing England and Wales.
Br J Cancer. 2014;111(9):1693-1702. doi:10.1038/bjc.2014.86


Mental health services 18 

18. MacKeith, Joy, Burns, Sara. Mental Health Recovery Star.
Mental Health Providers Forum; 2009. 



Talking therapies 19-23 

19. Evans, Jules. A brief history of IAPT: the mass provision of CBT in the NHS. The History of Emotions Blog. Published May 30, 2013. 

20. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. The Improving Access to Psychological Therapies manual. Published online August 2021. 

21. McCrone P. IAPT is probably not cost-effective.
Br J Psychiatry. 2013;202(5):383-383. doi:10.1192/bjp.202.5.383

22. Kendrick T, Chatwin J, Dowrick C, et al. Randomised controlled trial to determine the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors plus supportive care, versus supportive care alone, for mild to moderate depression with somatic symptoms in primary care: the THREAD (THREshold for AntiDepressant response) study.
Health Technol Assess. 2009;13(22). doi:10.3310/hta13220

23. Malpass A, Dowrick C, Gilbody S, et al. Usefulness of PHQ-9 in primary care to determine meaningful symptoms of low mood: a qualitative study.
Br J Gen Pract. 2016;66(643):e78-e84. doi:10.3399/bjgp16X683473


Wider provision 24-28 

24. Repper J, Carter T. A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services.
J Ment Health. 2011;20(4):392-411. doi:10.3109/09638237.2011.583947

25. Mahlke CI, Krämer UM, Becker T, Bock T. Peer support in mental health services.
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2014;27(4):276-281. doi:10.1097/YCO.0000000000000074

26. see note 24, Repper 2011

27. Trachtenberg, Marija, Parsonage, Michael, Shepherd, Geoff, Boardman, Jed. Peer Support in Mental Health Care: Is It Good Value for Money?
Centre for Mental Health; 2013. 

28. Friedli, Lynne, Parsonage, Michael. Promoting Mental Health and Preventing Mental Illness: The Economic Case for Investment in Wales.
All Wales Mental Health Promotion Network

Tables


Table 4.2 Recovery and Unrecovery star measures

a. MacKeith, Joy, Burns, Sara. Mental Health Recovery Star.
Mental Health Providers Forum; 2009. 

b. Recovery in the Bin. Unrecovery star.
https://recoveryinthebin.org/